The Einstein Case

Introductory remarks

The Case relates to the Theory of Relativity and the Big Bang Theory. The theory of relativity appears to consists of two theories, namely The special Relativity Theory advanced 1905 and “The general Relativity Theory” put forward 1916. But in reality the last one is only an extension of the first one. So in the following the expression “relativity theory” includes both of them. The Big Bang theory is also mentioned here because it is so closely related to the relativity theory, that it almost is a part of it.
In wide circles the relativity theory is mostly known for the statement, that moving clocks are running slower, and a person send on a space journey with high velocity likewise ages slower than his twin-brother at home on the Earth. An other statement is that it is impossible to measure velocity relative to the ether (which is the bearing medium for the light and other electromagnetic waves), and therefore there is neither absolute rest nor movement. Though many are of the opinion, that the ether do not exists at all.
The Theory of Big Bang is considered to be the scientific edition of the Genesis (The Creation Account). The Vatican and the ministers of religion in general go in for that point of view. According to the theory the whole Universe came into existence as a very little object exploded and by great forces send out its explosion-products in every directions. As the “smoke” cooled down it condensed to atoms, which later concentrate to form stars and galaxies. The whole Universe is thought still to expand because of the primordial velocity originating in the explosion.

Even though the first part of Einsteins work was published 1905, something serious did not happen until 1919. On a joint meeting of The Royal Society and The Royal Astronomical Society in London then it was announced, that Einsteins General Relativity Theory has been decisively confirmed by means of astrografic exposures of an eclipse the same year, carried out by british scientists, in West Africa and Brazil. On the meeting his theory was mentioned as “one of the highest achievements of human thought”. The next day Einstein was world-famous, and to day Einstein is given the credit of a great many things that has occured within the natural science since the publishing of the special relativity theory. The whole year 2005 was the centenary celebration of the genius.

In the meantime, how unbelieveable it may sound, documentation exists that the Theory of Relativity as well as the Theory of Big Bang are based on miscalculations. The foundation on which the theories are resting, may be said, unfortunately, to be inconsistent with reality. Though, in the course of time, a number of “proofs” of the theories has appeared, but as the case stand this “proofs” may be regarded as phenomenons, which are to be explained otherwise.

The development of the Einstein Case, quite short:

On the Theory of Relativity

In 1886 Michelson and Morley undertook a few trials in the course of 6 days, which should later be shown to get far-reaching consequences. At that time they had a theory saying that the Ether (The bearing medium of the light and other electromagnetic waves) free and unhindered penetrated every matter. The Earth was moving around the Sun, which moved around the centre of the Milky Way, which it self had a certain velocity, and thus all in all they had expectations to be able to measure a velocity of about 300 km pr.second (300 km s^-1). As an absolute minimum, they thought, it should be possible to measure the Earth's orbit-velocity around the Sun, 30 km s^-1.
In their article in 1887 it appears, that “the relative velocity of the earth and the ether is probably less than one sixth the earth's orbital velocity (5 km s^-1), and certainly less than one fourth (7.5 km s^-1).” The result was therefore regarded as a null-result.

Notwithstanding Einstein was convinced, that Michelson and Morley's measuring results proved that it was impossible, to measure velocity relative to the ether, and this became the foundation of the Relativity Theory. The consequence of this was among other things, that the speed of light on all occasions should be the same in all directions no matter the Earths rotation around its axis and its velocity around the Sun, and so on. In the beginning of the nineteen-hundreds there were more others trying to measure the ether-velocity and much larger velocities were measured, than those obtained by Michelson and Morley.
Dayton Miller had undertaken thousands of measurements at all seasons of the year in many years. From these also relatively small velocities he had been able to calculate the velocity of the Sun system relative to the free ether in the “empty” space. The result was a velocity of 208 km pr. second. But Einstein ignored it and said, that it was because of systematic errors, temperature variations or the like.
Einstein argued of course to save the once accepted "null-result". In the meantime a later revision (Cahill & Kitto, 2002) has shown, that there actually was systematic errors, but removal of the errors gave not a less, but on the contrary a much larger result, 359 km s^-1.
The relative velocity of the Sun system and the Ether has now been measured by means of modern advanced technology on board the satellite COBE, and the result is 365 km s^-1, corresponding to 1.3 million kilometres per hour. With this the foundation of the relativity theory has totally disappeared. Notwithstanding there are huge difficulties in making the established science give up the belief in the theory.

On the Theory of Big Bang

In the 1920's it was known, that the light from the stars had a colour depending on the distance. The longer away a star was the more red was its light, and the phenomenon was therefore called redshift. Hubble (1929) showed that the redshift was proportional to the distance, and as time went on they came to the agreement, that the redshift proved that the stars was moving away from us and from each other. Then they imagined, that going back in time every thing would get closer to each other. Sufficient back in time all matter in the whole Universe should have been concentrated in a little object, that must have exploded. This was the foundation of the Big Bang Theory. Later on they discovered a kind of radio waves, that they called the cosmic background radiation, and which were thought to stem from the primordial explosion. With this the Theory of Big Bang seems to be decisive confirmed.
The possibility that it was the atoms that continually changed the frequency is apparently never been considered. Though, astronomical observations since 1970 show, that the redshift is quantized, that one and the same galaxy can have two different redshifts and that a cluster of galaxies always have more. In addition it appears, that the redshift of the single celestial body is changing in the course of time. The conclusion is therefore, that the redshift cannot be a Doppler effect, and the stars be moving away is quite impossible. Thus the change of frequency is right, and the Theory of Big Bang is wrong.

The treatment of the Case

In the midst of 1950's a paper was send about the Theory of Relativity to prof.dr.dr.dr. Niels Bohr. From the Institute came an answer, that they had found an error. The error became corrected and a new paper forwarded, but not answered. Articles submitted to different journals was either refused or just ignored. In the beginning the arguments was nearest of philosofical art, while practical evidences was an article in short supply. Even if the evidences throughout the years was improved, nobody wished to co-operate.
In 1970 the whole matter was shelved, and not until some years later it was discovered, that just this year the american astronomer professor Ph.D. W.G.Tifft began to suspect the special character of the redshift, and had initiated an investigation. He discovered that the redshift is quantized, and as time went on more astronomers was involved in the investigation, and the certainty that there were a real phenomenon increased. Quantizing means, that there do not exist every possible values of redshift, but only a finite number with fixed jumps between. There was written articles and held symposiums, but the established science did not seem to know this matter.
Then 1991 came the results from the satellite COBE, that appeared to have measured a quite considerable velocity relative to the Ether, which immediate ought to have made the Theory of Relativity collapse. But neither the quantizing of the redshift nor the measuring of velocity relative to the Ether made the established science reject the theories.

In all the years nobody has answered the several submitted papers, send to usually qualified persons. Only after 2003 there has appeared a few but not particular positive answers. The following two examples give a little insight in the problems associated with the rectification of the mistake:
(Full text, click on the date)

2004.11.21 The two articles about respectively the Relativity and Big Bang was send on-line to Nature, who 2004.11.24 refused to publish these articles, and did not want to discuss why.

2005.04.11 Letter to the President of the Royal Society Lord Robert May of Oxford OM AC Kt. The two articles about respectively the Relativity and Big Bang are enclosed. It was suggested that The Royal Society together with the Royal Astronomical Society in 1919 had been contributing in making Einstein world-famous, and that those mistakes Einstein had made only justly could be rectified if those two Societies together clarified the case publicly. An authority were necessary to make people surmount the false belief in the theories.

At the same time an identical letter was send to the President of The Royal Astronomical Society Professor PhD Kathryn A. Whaler.

2005.04.20 Lord Robert May replied that he could not co-operate because of intern rules and procedurer. He explained, that the right procedure was, to submit the articles to peer reviewed journals. Unfortunately Lord May was not informed that this procedure had been followed several times without result.

2005.05.08 New letter to Lord Robert May with an amplification of the gravity and complexity of the situationen. – It was explained that if the two Societies just as in 1919 did not come out with an officially announcement, the chances of getting the mistake rectified would be very little.

2005.05.11 Lord Robert May recommended now, to put the two articles on the World Wide Web, but suggest that he anticipated the chances against the establishment slight.

2005.11.10 The two articles about respectively the Relativity and Big Bang were submitted on-line to Journal of Scientific Exploration (JSE) for publication. – Both of them was turned down 2005.11.21.

JSE writes otherwise on theire home page: "Journal of Scientific Exploration publishes material consistent with the Society's mission: to provide a professional forum for critical discussion of topics that are for various reasons ignored or studied inadequately within mainstream science."
Whereas this description fits perfectly to the two articles, and seeing that JSE obviously were not able to find any technical or scientifically error in the articles, it was not a refusal one awaited from this side.

____________

About refusal and passivity

Since the beginning of last century Einstein has been surrounded with such a great reputation and so large confidence, that it has blocked for decisive criticism and hindered alternative theories in coming out. There can be no doubt, that it was the events in 1919 — the eclipse-expeditions and the subsequent joint meeting of the Royal Society and The Royal Astronomical Society — that started this.
As to the events in 1919 it can strongly be recommended to read “Anomalies in the History of Relativity” written by Jan McCausland in Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol.13, No. 2, pp. 271-290, 1999, 892-3310/99.
The article can be found and read on-line under “Abstract & Online Articles” on the address: www.scientificexploration.org/jse

A copious résumé of Jan McCausland’s “Anomalies in the History of Relativity” can be read in "Eclipse 1919".

There is only two ways upon which it can be done, to disregard such a grave criticism of the two theories:
1) Superstition. An absolute belief in the theories, which among other things has the consequence, that criticism is looked at as nonsense, that nobody of course should waste his time on. As the belief can be proven wrong, it is in reality superstition, presumably of the type orthodoxy.
2) Deliberate swindle. That is to say, after having ascertained that the criticism is both grave and irrefutable, then only let things slide. It is an easy solution. While it would be unpleasant to make confessions, it would be extremely easy and safe to kill the whole matter only by keeping silent, even if one in this way are taking part in anomalies in the billion class.

When possibility nr.2 obviously can be practised without any risk, one could be tempted to think, that it was this that were taking place. There exists neither science inspection, science police nor science court of justice. The elite is itself the highest authority and expertise. They have control over the most important journals, so the dissidents can be refused. They have good relations to funds and treasuries, while the dissidents in there isolation, have to manage their economic problems on their own, which usually ends dismal.

Though, in order that the domain should not appear as quite lawless, there in Denmark is established an institution, “The Commissions concerning Scientific Dishonesty”.

In an announcement concerning those Commissions are established some lines of direction for the activities of the Commissions as provided by §4e, sub. 4, in law about research-advising etc., laid down in consolidated act nr. 676 of 19 august 1997.
In §2, sub.2, is in the meantime said: “May it in advance be considered unlikely, that there will be found for the plaintiff, the case can be dismissed.” – That is to say, that if the judges and theirs advisers are believing in the theories, they can without problems refuse what they do not believe in (or dislike). Besides, no believer could ever imagine, that anybody should practise possibility nr.2 (deliberate swindle). That thought presupposes they know the theories are wrong, but this is of course denied by the believers. Therefore it goes without saying, that an accusation stating the theories are wrong, will not even be considered. Thus the gates are left wide open for superstition as well as deliberate swindle, but closed for the truth about the Einstein Case.

Even though it seems completely absurd, when it is about the natural science, it must in spite of everything be nr.1 (the superstition), that is the problem. It is unthinkable that in thousands of scientists all over the world should agree upon keeping down the rest of the population of the Earth in ignorance about, that these two theories are untrue and quite without connection to the reality.
That it all is due to superstition ought likewise to be unthinkable, but a third possibility do not exist. Everyone who are willing to spend the neccesary time on controlling the references and argumentations, will be convinced that everything is correct. It should seems arrogant to refuse a real grave criticism for 50 years, without controlling if there should be a trueth in it. In fact it is my conviction that everyone want to help a lost soul out of the delusion. But when the “delusion” cannot be refused, and the belief on "the generally accepted" is stronger than both the astronomical observations and the logic arguments. What to do then? They are shelving the case, it could happen the problem would solve itself in time! But what should be changed? The only which could and ought to be changed is the superstition. But how does one do that?

How can the belief be stronger than the logic? - Unfortunately it can easily be done. It is everyday for professional hypnotists. In this case it all started with the confidence (orthodoxy) in the two Royal Societies in London 1919, their distinguished presidents with their good reputation and fine titles, and the members ditto. For the journalists it was a sensation that such a crazy theory suddenly was decisively confirmed. Thus it was front-page story on all newspapers worldwide the day after the meeting. That made the confidence if possibly still more strong. That the historical research later should reveal that the evidence was without any value (Jan McCausland 1999), no one suspected. In the course of time the belief has been reinforced, partly because of more “proofs” and partly because of the time itself and the many “lost souls”, who are "put in their place” because their attack was lost on the superstition. Only an enthusiastic teacher, who himself is 100% believing in what he lectures on, and besides have a whole world of scientists behind, will have an influence on the listeners, like the hypnotist influences his “medium”. In this way the superstition is transferred from generation to generation.

“The Judgment”

Einstein (1925) wrote in Science: “If Dr. Miller’s observations should be confirmed, were the Relativity Theory false. The experience is the highest judge”.
Einstein was quite right. But what he surely did not anticipate was, that we now have experienced that the satellite COBE (1989 -1991) several times has measured velocities relative to the Ether. Thus the velocity of the solar system has been shown to be 365 km per second. With that Dr. Miller’s observations is decisive confirmed, and the Relativity Theory is false.
Also the Theory of Big Bang is false, partly because the Theory of Relativity is, but also because astronomical observations disprove it.

Besides refer to the articles "The Theory of Relativity" and "The Theory of Big Bang".

What has to happen with ongoing billion-projects, such as satellites, ring-accelerators (colliders) and Big Bang-mashines is irrelevant. Quite exactly it concerns following effects:

Satellits

COBE Cosmic Background Explorer. Launched in 1989. Results in 1991.

WMAP Measuring the background radiation more precise then COBE. Launched in 2001.

Results in 2003

Planck Measuring the background radiation more precise then WMAP. Will be launched

by ESA in 2007.

SAP Supernova Acceleration Probe. Examination of Dark Energy. Will be launched in

2008.

Accelerators

LEP CERN closed LEP down in 2000 in order to begin a rebuilding for 1.7 billion dollar.

It should give a new and more powerful accellerator in 2006.

LHC Large Hadron Collider. Shall be build into the same tunnel as LEP. Will be put into

service in 2007.

Tesla One 33 km long “electron-positron-accelerator” costing 4 billion dollars. Will be build

by Deutches Elektronen-Synchroton in Hamburg. Expected ready in 2013.

CLIC Compact Linear Collider. A CERN-project. May be ready in 2025.

USA Project: Next Linear Collider.

Japan Project: Japan Linear Collider.

RHIC. Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. The accelerator is situated in New York and is the

one that should be able to “re-create” the earliest stage after Big Bang, a “quark-gluon-plasma”. Consists of two rings, each with a circumference of 3.8 km. The particles is pre-accelerated to near the velocity of light in other accelerators before they are sent into RHIC, were they are circulated 80.000 times pr. second, each ring in opposite directions, and supplied more energy. This accelerator employs more than 1000 physicists.

MAC Myon-Antimyon Collider. A desire which for technical reasons can be executed by 2030 earliest.

SSC The American “Superconducting Super Collider” in Texas should also be mentioned.

It should also provide information about the extreme conditions, which prevailed the first fraction of a second after “ignition” (Big Bang). The collider, which should be installed in an underground tunnel, should have a circumference of 86 km, and the price was calculated at 12 billion dollars. It should have been ready in 1999, but when 21 km of the head-tunnel was completed and 2.3 billion had been spend, in an attempt to “re-create” the primordial stage just after “ignition”, the work was stopped because of a shortage of funds. For security reasons 0.6 billion was granted to shut down the project. Price in all: 2.9 billion dollars for a hole in the earth.

After “The Judgment”

Some of the consequences of the relativity theory has been, that it has blocked the road for alternative theories and that it via the theory of Big Bang has absorbed a large quantity of economic means. After the judgment then one should be able to expect a greater openness as to new theories of gravitation and reports about successful anti-gravitation-experiments. Furthermore one should expect new possibilities of giving resources to investigation and experiments, which earlier has been refused.
While the satellits and accelerators have been looked at as scientific progress, following radical inventions and projects (attempting to solve the problems with the decreasing energy resources and the increasing pollution) mentioned below, have now for a hundred years been regarded as fighting against all common sense.
One of the reasons to that has been a widespread ignorance about scientific trials and theories, which make these activities common sense. It is a matter of:

Quantum-energy converters

It is devices that convert quantum field energy to common usable energy, electric current and engine power. They are designated as “COP>1 systems”, that means systems with a "Coefficient Of Performance” greater then 1, which again means, that they yield more energy than they are supplied with in common traditional way. Compared with satellits and accelerators this is of a line of much cheaper projects, but though expensive enough so that no private inventor have been able to raise the needed capital to product maturing and marketing.
It is devices which, as already mentioned, are able to deliver electrical energy and engine power, without being supplied with fuel of any nature. The devices do not produce energy out of nothing, but just convert existing energy. They could for that matter be called perpetual motion machine, if we put a little different meaning in the word. The quantum field is present all over the Universe, even in 100% vacuum (the “empty” space), and contain inexhaustible large quantity of energy. The devices solve both the energy- and environmental problems at the same time, when the process is not connected to any kind of waste (or contaminants), neither radioactivity nor other kind of pollution.
The earliest devices contained radioactive matter, which at that time was easy obtainable, and therefore some one have stated that the energy came from the radioactivity. This thought that the energy came from the “empty space” is difficult to accept for the mainstream of our days scientists. Notwithstanding that available scientific evidences show this is posible, and that there are scientific articles about it, this information has obvious not yet found the way to the textbooks, and this is whay the whole matter is meet with great scepticism. Though, it is not the only kind of resistance being in evidence.

Here is a list about some of the devices. There are in all likelihood three times as many as here mentioned:

T.Henry Moray. First device produced 8 watt in 1910. Four was made in all. The last one

reached 3000 watt in 1940. The device was destroyed by an uninvited guest and was never build up again later.

Harry E. Perrigo. First device in 1915. Reached in 1922 an effect on 4.500 watt.

Alfred Hubbard. A device yielded 100 watt in 1919. An other device yielded 26.000 watt in 1926 (35 hp motor boat).

Lester Hendershot. The device yielded 100 watt in 1930, 300-500 watt in late 1930 and
1000 watt in 1950.

Testatika. An electric generator. The informations are scanty. Now ten years ago a generator on 10 kilowatt was under construction.

Sweets vacuum-triode-amplifier. Yielded 1,5 mio. times as much energy as it was supplied.

Gabriel Kron. Negative resistor operated the network-analyzer at Stanford University.

Prof. Deborah Chung at University of Buffalo inventeted a negative resistor too. Tested for one year. Patent application made by the University.

US Patent 4,835,433 of 30.05.1989. Dr. Paul M. Brown.

US Patent 5.018.180 of 1991. Shoulders. The device should among other things be able to make use of nuclear waste as an energy source.

US Patent 5.494.559 of 27.02.1996. PPC (Dr. James Patterson's Power Cell). The most important contents of the device is 0,8 mm patented plastic balls coated with nickel and palladium. In addition common or destilled water. The device yield as much as 4000 times as much direct current as it is supplied.

US Patent 5,590,031 of 31.12.1996. Dr. Frank Mead. System for converting electromagnetic radiation energy to electrical energy. (Classical electromagnetic zero point radiation).

US Patent 5,594,289 of 14.01.1997 Kohei Minato. Magnetmotor. Efficiency 330 %.

US Patent 5,436,518 of 25.07.1995 Teruo Kawai. Magnetmotor. Efficiency 318 %.

RQM electric generator. Company RQM AG. Patent-number not available. Efficiency 940 % .

UK Patent GB 2 282 708 B. Harol Aspden (England) and Robert George Adams (New Zealand). Electrical Motor-Generator. Yield large electrical effect or mechanical driving force by little input.

US Patent 5.449.989. XS NRG PAGD (Pulsed Abnormal Glow Discharge). Energy- converter developed by Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa, Labofex, Canada. Both input and output are direct current. On a congress in Denver Correa made it clearly, that it was possible to make a 1000 watt direct current converter being the size of a shoe box.

US Patent US 6,362,718 B1. MEG. (Motionless Electromagnetic Generator). The inventors

have founded a company Magnetic Energy Ltd. To reach a production mature model there is a deficit of $ 29 - 30m, corresponding to $ 9m a year for three years.
Thomas Bearden, one of the inventors of MEG and spokesman for the company, says: The real problem within >>the surplus-energy-field<< (which is a not yet recognized scientific field) is, that the most successful devices, constructed by inventors, still need a considerable research and development effort to come from the little laboratory experiment to a stable unit, that can be mass-produced and be put in the energy supply of habitations and offices etc.
It is a problem of multi-million-dollar-order. Until now do not one of the 50 or more successful experimental devices, developed by different inventors since 1910, did go through this developmental work to be marketed. Until a few years ago a successful surplus-machine could kill you. As an example T.Henry Moray survived several shot-attempts by driving a bullet proof car! Several times the assassins shoot at him from a side street or a passage, but the bullets were not able to penetrate and hit him. Sweet, with whom I have worked together for some time, also came under fire from a silenced rifle at a distance of about 300 meters. By the irony of fate he stumbled over a stair and the bullet whistled past his ear.
Several COP>1 power systems developed in Japan, for instance the Kawai-process, were forcibly removed from the market by a japanese organisation.
What did not succeed for all those inventors, that got so far, was to raise the needed capital to finalize the fundamental research and carry out the necessary mathematical calculation. Before this is done, one stand with a >>unique<< invention rather than a practical usable system.

So we try to let >>leak<< as much theory about “legal” surplus-systems as possible out to the public together with >>hard<< physical data, which can be checked to secure, that there is talk about genuine physical principle.
Bearden concludes: A single grant of 200 mio. dollars to a solid investigation in electromagnetic energy from the vacuum should be able to solve the energy-crisis for ever, and reduce the pollution of the biosphere.

WFC (Water Fuel Cell). Stan Meyer, Grove City, Ohio has discovered that a pulsating high tension field (40 000 Volt) can get water-molecules to separate in Oxygen and Hydrogen, which thereafter can be ignited and e.g. drive a piston in a car engine. The energy coming from this process correspond pr. gallon water to 2.5 mio. barrels of oil. The energy comes naturally from the quantum field.

Dr. Eugene Antonov and Dr. Vladimir Dresyiannikov, Ukrainian Institute of Energy Research; Dr. Tibor Nagypal, Vienna; Roy Azevedo, Peter Graneau and Charles Millet from Northeastern University, Boston; Neal Graneau, Kings College, London; Gary Johnson, Kansas State University and Rea O’Neill, Dublin Institute of Technology have among others experimentally verified Meyer's patented technology.

Notwithstanding Meyer has been accused and sentenced for heaped coarse fraud.

Recapitulation

We may give thanks to the satellite programmes, for having measured the velocity relative to the ether a number of times. Smoot's report, true enough, used the expression “velocity relative to the cosmic background radiation field”. But this field can only be the Ether, when "the cosmic background radiation” is electromagnetic waves like the light, radiowaves etc. Although Einstein stated, that it was impossible to measure velocity relative to the ether, it was his conviction, that the same ether was necessary for transmitting the electromagnetic waves.

The task of the accelerators has been to come as close as possible to the Big Bang explosion, to study the behaviour of the matter under the extreme conditions, which is supposed to have prevailed immediatly after “ignition”. On account of the Big Bang Theory's missing connection to the reality, it must be said that the original purpose of the accelerators is lost.

According to Thomas Bearden a single grant of $ 200m dollars to a solid investigation in electromagnetic energy from the vacuum (quantum field) should be able to solve the energy-crisis for ever, and reduce the pollution of the biosphere.

For outsiders it is impossible to say if the $ 200m proposed by Thomas Bearden is a sound investment. Even though the quantum field seems to contain inexhaustible quantities of non-polluting energy which in principle is possible to utilize, it is still a matter of faith if it is possible to make the converters ready for production and practical use for the amount mentioned and within a foreseeable space of time.

For an outsider it is a lottery ticket at $ 200m, which may newer come out. But if it does come out, the prize is inconceivable great.

Let us compare this, with what we get, for the great amount of money spend on Big Bang-machines, namely "employment of a great many scientists", and broadly nothing else. Also several billions go to the Hot Fusion, which nobody would care about, if the quantum-energy could be made use of. When the society can afford this, it should be no object to spend a few hundred millions of dollars to investigate if just one of the existing proposals of quantum converters should be a realistic offer to provide free and non-polluting energy.

____________

As a matter of fact it is rather grotesque, that so many inventors are struggling so hard to realise there idéas, while one can read on the internet that some here on the Earth for several years have had fully developed and functional energy-systems exactly as the inventors have in view. It seems like the development is even further on. It is said that UFO's have been copied with good result. The cause of this paradox is, that this is a strictly guarded secret within powerful organizations in at least one country here on the earth.
Quite an other organization by the name of “The Disclosure Project” is working hard to get public access to these projects, and has through several years gathered hundreds of testimonies from former employees from the above-mentioned organizations.

One of the witnesses explains: That he has seen a fully functional and free hovering reproduction of a “foreign” object (UFO). We have not just operational anti-gravitation propulsion systems, but has had them for years, and they have been developed after studies of non-terrestrial crafts over the last 50 years.

Another witness warns against the human tendency to make every new technology into a weapon, pointing out that our weaponization of space does not address the threat of Earth terrorists, and the idea of using these weapons against extraterrestrial targets would be suicidal.

All the other witness stories and more can be seen on the homepage of “The Disclosure Project”. One of the means that have made the secrecy possible is the ridicule of people that take UFOs and non-terrestrial civilizations seriously. Sadly the ridicule of the whole topic is a very effective mean that will keep many from taking these lines seriously. I can only refer to the homepage www.disclosurproject.org, and remind you about the two forms of superstitions:
1) To believe in phenomenons that are non-existant.
2) Not to believe in phenomenons which are existant.

Furtunately there are a pair of organisations (theorionproject.org and aero2012.com), the aim of which it is to provide new energy-solutions as replacement of the fossil fuel. If only they may succeed.

____________

If the “judgment” are to be commonly known and accepted, a great number of persons must visit this and similar homepages. But to find a homepage, one must know the address, what nobody does in advance, with a homepage as its put on the World Wide Web initially. To find it when one does not know the address, and don't know it's there either, could in principle happen by a mere chance, when a machine like Google handles a key word. But how great is the chance? If Google gets the key word "Einstein" this search-machine finds a list of 42 000 000 homepages (Web Sites) in a fraction of a second. But if one should assess which one of these homepages one should choose to read, and one should use 1 second at each sites, it would take some 12 000 hours to go through the whole list. Hardly anyone would get further than to number 500.

Google evaluates the importance of a homepage by the number of links to it. The one who got the greatest number of links will be placed at the top of the list. A homepage just coming out on the Web, and which nobody of course have given a link, will be no. 42 000 001. In principle everyone can look at this site, but in real life, at most it will be friends and acquaintances. And when the magazines will not touch this "Einstein-Case" with a fire poker, the old false theories will live on undisturbed, while the billions keep flowing.

The "Einstein-Case" is a deterring exemple. Orthodoxy is a dangerous kind of superstition, as a matter of fact it can be deadly dangerous. A textbook exemple on this is the loss of the "Titanic". The ship was build so that it could not sink. Therefore it was thought that there was no need for lifeboats. Nevertheless, as an extra luxury, the ship was equipped with lifeboats for half of the passengers.
During the maiden voyage Titanic was warned from another ship, which itself was not moving, that the region was full of dangerous icebergs. But Titanic just proceeded, and soon after the whole side was torn up by an iceberg. When finally the lifeboats was put into the water, only one fourth of the passengers took to the boats. They felt more secure aboard the ship. As it eventually sank and the passengers lay in the cold water fighting for their lives, the lifeboats had to row away in order not to be turned over by the panic-striken people. As a consequence of every ones belief, that the ship could not sink, 1556 lives was lost.

July 2006
H.Lundsgart